“Countless
people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it.”
— H.G. Wells, The New World Order (1940)
Throughout our
lives and throughout our culture, we are conditioned to rally around concepts
of false division. We are led to believe that Democrats and Republicans are
separate and opposing parties, yet they are actually two branches of the same
political-control mechanism. We are led to believe that two nations such as the
United States and Russia are geopolitical enemies, when, in fact, they are two
puppet governments under the dominance of the same international financiers.
Finally, we are told that the international bankers themselves are somehow
separated by borders and philosophies, when the reality is all central banks
answer to a singular authority: the Bank Of International Settlements (BIS).
We are regaled
with stories of constant conflict and division. Yet the truth is there is only
one battle that matters, only one battle that has ever mattered: the battle
between those people who seek to control others and those people who simply
wish to be left alone.
The “New World
Order” is a concept created not in the minds of “conspiracy theorists” but in
the minds of those who seek to control others. These are the self-appointed
elite who fancy themselves grandly qualified to determine the destiny of every
man, woman and child at the expense of individual freedom and
self-determination. In this article, I would like to examine the nature of our
war with the elite and why their theories on social engineering are illogical,
inadequate and, in many cases, malicious and destructive.
The
‘Greater Good’
I have always
found it fascinating that while elitists and NWO champions constantly proclaim
that morality is relative and that conscience is not inherent, somehow they are
the ones who possess the proper definition of the “greater good.” If “good” is
in all cases relative, then wouldn’t the “greater good” also be entirely
relative? This inconsistency in their reasoning does not seem to stop them from
forcing the masses through propaganda or violence to accept their version of
better judgment.
As many
psychologists and anthropologists (including Carl Jung and Steven Pinker) have
proven over decades of study, moral compass and conscience are not mere
products of environment; they are inborn ideals outside of the realm of
environmental influences. The greater good is inherently and intuitively felt
by most people. Whether one listens to this voice of conscience is up to the
individual.
It is no
accident that NWO elites end up contradicting themselves by claiming morality
to be meaningless while pronouncing their personal morality to be pure. In
order to obtain power over others, they must first convince member of the
public that they are empty vessels without meaning or direction. They must
convince the masses to ignore their inner voice of conscience. Only then will
the public sacrifice freedoms to purchase answers they don’t really need from
elites who don’t really have them.
Collectivism
I don’t claim
to know what ideology would make a perfect society, and I certainly don’t know
the exact solutions needed to get there. What I do know, though, is that no one
else knows either. Whenever anyone takes a stage to announce that only he has
the answers to the world’s problems, I cannot help but be suspicious of his
motives. Rarely, if ever, do I hear these people suggest that more liberty and
more individualism will make a better future. Instead, their solution always
entails less freedom, more control and more force in order to mold society
towards their vision.
The utopia
offered by the power elite invariably demands a collectivist mindset that the
individual must give up his self-determination and independence so the group
can survive and thrive. The problem is no society, culture or collective can
exist without the efforts and contributions of individuals. Therefore, the liberty
and prosperity of the individual is far more important than the safety or even
existence of the group.
The elites
understand this fact, which is why they do reserve some individuality (for
their own tiny circle).
No matter the
guise presented — whether it be socialism, communism, fascism or some
amalgamation of each — the goal is always the same: collectivism and slavery
for the masses and unrestrained gluttony for the oligarchs.
The
Philosophy Of Force
If your idea
of a better society is a good and rational one, you should not need to use
force in order to get people to accept it. Only intrinsically destructive ideas
require the use of force to frighten the public into compliance. The NWO is an
idea that relies entirely on force.
Globalization
has been consistently sold to us as part of the natural progression of mankind,
yet this “natural progression” is always advanced through the use of lies,
manipulation, fear and violence. The NWO concept is one of complete
centralization, a centralization that cannot be achieved without the use of
terror, for who would support the creation of a malicious global power
authority unless he was terrorized into doing so?
The only
morally acceptable use of force is the use of force to defend against attack.
As the NWO relentlessly presses forward its attack on our freedoms, we, the
defenders, are labeled “violent extremists” if we refuse to go along quietly.
The NWO’s dependency on force to promote its values makes it an inherently
flawed methodology derived from ignorance and psychopathy, rather than wisdom
and truth.
Dishonesty
As Policy
As with the
use of violence, the use of lies to achieve success automatically poisons
whatever good may have been had through one’s efforts. The elites commonly
shrug off this logic by convincing each other that there is such a thing as a
“noble lie” (both Saul Alinsky and Leo Strauss, the gatekeepers of the false
left/right paradigm, promoted the use of “noble lies”) and that the masses need
to be misled so that they can be fooled into doing what is best for themselves
and the world. This is, of course, a sociopathic game of self-aggrandizement.
Lies are
rarely, if ever, exploited by people who want to make the lives of other men
better; lies are used by people who want to make their own lives better at the
expense of others. Add to this the egomaniacal assertion that the elites are
lying for “our own good” when they are actually only out to elevate their
power, and what you get is a stereotypical abusive relationship on a global
scale.
Methodologies
that have legitimate benefits to mankind deliberately seek truth and do not
need to hide behind a veil of misinformation and misdirection. If a methodology
requires secrecy, occultism and deceit in order to establish itself in a
culture, then it is most likely a negative influence on that culture, not a
positive one.
The Hands
Of The Few
Why does
humanity need a select elite at all? What purpose does this oligarchy really
serve? Is centralized power really as efficient and practical as it is painted
to be? Or is it actually a hindrance to mankind and an obstacle in our quest to
better ourselves? Champions of the NOW argue that global governance is
inevitable and that sovereignty in any form is the cause of all our ills.
However, I find when I look back at the finer points of history (the points
they don’t teach you in college textbooks), the true cause of most of the
world’s ills is obviously the existence of elitist groups.
The
“efficiency” of centralization is useful only to those at the top of the
pyramid, because it generally stands on a vast maze of impassable bureaucracy.
It has to. No hyper-condensed authority structure can survive if the citizenry
is not made dependent on it. Centralization makes life harder for everyone by
removing our ability to provide our own essentials and make our own choices.
That is to say, centralization removes all alternative options from the system,
until the only easy path left is to bow down to the establishment.
I have never
seen a solid example of centralization of power resulting in a better society
or happier people. I have also never come across a select group of leaders
intelligent enough and compassionate enough to oversee and micromanage the
intricate workings of the whole of the Earth. There is no use for the elite, so
one must ask why we keep them around.
The
Opposite View
Arguing over
what should be done about the state of the world is a fruitless endeavor until
one considers what should be done about the state of his own life. As long as
men are stricken by bias, selfish desire and lack of awareness, they will never
be able to determine what is best for other people. The opposing philosophy to
the NWO, the philosophy of the Liberty Movement, holds that no one has the
right to impose his particular version of a perfect society on anyone else. As
soon as someone does, he has committed a grievous attack against individual
liberty — an attack that must be answered.
Our answer is
simply that the people who want to control others be removed from positions of
control and that the people who want to be left alone just be left alone.
Association and participation should always be voluntary; otherwise, society
loses value. This is not anarchy in the sense that consequence is removed.
Rather, the rights of the individual become paramount; and the liberties of the
one take precedence over the ever vaporous demands of some abstract group.
The only
reason for any government to exist is to safeguard individual freedom. Period.
The original intent of America’s Founding Fathers was to establish a Nation
that fostered this ideal. When government or oligarchy steps outside the bounds
of this mandate, it is no longer providing the service it was originally
designed for; and it must be dismantled. Unfortunately, it is a universal rule
that uncompromising tyranny must often be met with uncompromising revolution.
When a new
system arises that cannibalizes the old, enslaves our future, uses aggression
against us and mutilates our founding principles in the name of arbitrary
progress, that new system must be defied and ultimately destroyed. The NWO
ideology represents one of the most egregious crimes against humanity of all
time, posing in drag as our greatest hope. It is based, fundamentally, on
everything that makes life terrible for the common man and everything our
inherent conscience fights against.
We would be
far better served as a species if we were to turn our back on the NWO altogether
and move swiftly in the opposite direction. Imagine what tomorrow would be like
if there were no controllers, no statists, no despots and no philosopher kings.
Imagine a tomorrow where people respect the natural-born rights of others.
Imagine a tomorrow where people’s irrational fears are not allowed to inhibit
other people’s freedoms. Imagine a tomorrow where interactions between citizens
and government are rare or nonexistent. Imagine if we could live our days in
peace, independently building our own destinies, in which our successes and
failures are our own, rather than the property of the collective. It may not be
a perfect world, or a utopia, but I suspect it would be a much better place
than we live in today.